Intentional Ignorance
- May 14th, 2010
- By Editor
- Write comment
After publicly complaining since its inception about Arizona’s new law that allows state enforcement of current Federal immigration laws, Attorney General Holder finally admitted that he has not even read the law. He has put much effort toward defeating this law which he thinks is racist and unconstitutional. But he has never read the law. He stated that he knows about it though because of what he’s read in the papers.
Senators and Congressmen voted for the Big Government Health Care Boondoggle without even reading it. Nancy Pelosi said that “we have to pass the law so that we can find out what is in it”. The President, who also did not read the whole 2000 page bloat-law, had previously agreed to sign into law whatever health care bill comes to his desk. Much debate was made by people who never read the law.
Politicians throw the term “unconstitutional” around as if they have read the Constitution. They may have read it but learned about it by reading public school textbooks. We know that they must have either not read it or just did not read the whole thing – which isn’t really that long. The part about the enumerated powers of the Federal Government is a particularly short passage.
Politicians have condemned movies that have come out without ever seeing them. They condemn Republican proposals for laws without ever reading them. They call for bans on video games without ever playing them. They say police officers acted “stupidly” without hearing the officer’s story. They push for legislation on “climate change” without ever reading a scientific study themselves. They call their critics “evil Nazi’s” apparently without knowing what the Nazi’s actually did. They make statements about “True Islam” without reading the Koran and misquote lines from the bible that are really from the works of William Shakespeare. They call certain talk radio hosts “dangerous” but have never listened to their shows.
It sure seems that so many elected officials who believe that they know better how to run our lives never bothered to learn about the actual topic that they are passing judgement on. Emotion and how they “feel” are more important to them than critical analysis. When challenged by someone who does in fact know about the topic and wishes to talk about it, these politicians feel threatened and often resort to name calling in order to change the subject.
To anybody who may aspire to someday run for public office: Please learn about the topic that you will be voting on or condemning. Starting a debate over what you have “read in the papers” is unsatisfying to analytical minds and useless to our society in general. Just like how it should be in school, do your homework so that the next day in class, you can talk about what you learned and be better prepared to know what you are talking about.